“highly significant”

The present study revealed a highly significant association between the incidence of COVID-19 infections in Iranian provinces and their respective distance from Qom ( p < 0.001; C = -0.68) (Fig. 2 ).

While the pre-versus-post comparison of primary and secondary outcomes of the control group (received immunosuppressive therapies only) did not show a significant improvement ( p > 0.05), the same comparison within the weight-loss group showed a highly significant improvement in primary and secondary outcomes ( p < 0.001).

We observed highly significant strain effects for almost all behavioral measurements investigated ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed in the crude protein (13.6% to 9.3%), crude ash (8.0% to 6.6%), and acid detergent fiber (31.9% to 38.6%) contents among the tested samples. 4.

The differences between the three groups (“much better”, “somewhat better”, and “unchanged”) were highly significant for both physicians’ and patients’ judgement ( p < 0.001).

In all cases the differences were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001), and could be confirmed by IgG-binding to a cyclic peptide representing the conformational auto-epitope within the second extracellular loop of the receptor associated with the active receptor conformation ( Table 1 ).

This quantification showed a dramatic and highly significant depletion of CD19+ B cells in AML patients (mean frequency ± standard deviation; HD: 12.4 ± 8.3; AML: 2.9 ± 3.2, p < 0.001) ( Figure 1B ).

The description of variables are as follows: Description of quantitative variables: mean and standard deviation (SD) Description of qualitative variables: numbers (No.) and percentages (%) Comparison between both groups regarding categorical data using the Chi-square test Comparison between both groups regarding scale data done using the independent t test The significance results were assessed in the form of P value: Non-significant when P value > 0.05 Significant when P value ≤ 0.05 Highly significant when P value ≤ 0.001 Results This study is a prospective single-center comparative study.

The analysis of variance (Table 3 ) showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) between accessions in all assessed quantitative agronomic characteristics.

There was a highly significant difference in weight reduction compared to non-diabetic patients, (two-way ANOVA P < .001).

There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) enrichment of CSF tracer in the subarachnoid space (SAS) adjacent to the straight gyrus with peak enrichment after 3–6 h (Fig. 1 ; Supplementary Table S1 ).

This difference in worker caste integration effect among body regions was highly significant (two‐sample z test; p < .001).

A Chi-squared test showed highly significant differences in AE reporting (p≤0.001) and AE grading (p≤0.001) Lower grades were more frequently reported for nonsurgical AEs.

Overall, in all four bone qualities, the adapted drilling protocol had a highly significant effect on the insertion torque (PCF 35: F1, 398 = 115.5; p < 0.001; PCF 25: F2, 453 = 850; p < 0.001; PCF 15: F2, 671 = 924; p < 0.001; PCF10: F2, 485 = 241; p < 0.001).

1 , the correlation coefficients (r) between both methods were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001) and ranged from 0.91 (Ca) to 0.94 (P).

Thus, our final model included the six explanatory variables (pH + TOC + F + Cl + SO 4 + PO 4 ), it was highly significant ( P = 0.001), and it produced two significant canonical correspondent axes (CCA1: p = 0.0001 and CCA2: p = 0.015).

In STS and BS, grading was a highly significant predictor for worse survival ( p < 0.001), as well as age ( p < 0.001) and metastatic disease ( p < 0.001) during the follow-up.

Asterisks indicate significance of the likelihood ratio (LR) test (* p -value < 0.05, ** p -value < 0.01 and *** p -value < 0.001- highly significant).

These differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for both spectral channels.

Pairwise Nemenyi post hoc test for multiple comparisons showed no difference between the natural articulation-plus-translation condition and the only-articulation condition, p = 0.840, but highly significant differences between all other conditions, p < 0.001.

Regarding ALT as well as triglycerides, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference between the tested groups: H (2) = 17.6, p < 0.001, H (2) = 20.2, p < 0.001, respectively.

Analysis with the Fisher's Exact test (one sided) revealed that the overlap is highly significant (P < 0.001).

Resting pressure: The mean pressure was 58.1 ± 15.1 mmHg among continent cases, 49.1 ± 15.1 mmHg among minor incontinent cases, and 37.1 ± 12.1 mmHg among major incontinent cases with a highly significant difference between continent and major incontinent groups (P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

Each shift is highly significant ( p < 0.001), underscoring a metabolic drift in pre-cancer lesions toward taxa exploiting inorganic electron acceptors and light ( Figure 7 ). 3.4.