“highly significant”

We found a highly significant positive relationship between the risk score and TMB (Spearman coefficient: r = 0.24, P < 0.001) ( Figure 10D ).

All differences are highly significant ( P <0.001) compared to the relevant control.

Notably, CS 2 patients had significantly shorter overall survival compared to CS 1 and CS 3, with overall survival (OS) being highly significant ( p < 0.001; Fig. 1 D).

However, the increase in AST levels was highly significant (p < 0.001) in the EBV/HCV (93.9 ± 11.39 U/mL), HCV (75.4 ± 16.5 U/mL) and EBV (51.5 ± 8.3 U/mL) patients compared to the NC (29.5 ± 14.2) ( Fig. 3 ).

Regarding GF group, it showed a highly significant increase in the percentage of open DTs after the citric acid challenge ( p = 0.001).

TSP) had a highly significant effect on the isotope signature of AAs extracted (F 13,208 = 376; p < 0.001) with EPS AAs being more enriched in 15 N than those in the total soil (TSP), 0.76% compared to 0.60%, respectively (l.s.d. = 0.02 Atom%).

As Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1 demonstrate, a broad range of phenotypic values were observed for each trait within each environment, and differences among genotypes were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all traits.

For all cases, significance level was established at α = 0.05, and defining 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 as statistically significant (*), 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 as whole level significance (***). 3.

Multivariable models were constructed using explanatory variables chosen a priori based on clinical importance, and those that were observed to be highly significant in univariable models ( P < .001).

The linear regression analysis between the total amount of bacteria and changes in weight proved highly significant (p<0.001, R 2 = 0.39) and with a correlation coefficient of -0.62.

A quantitative analysis of lipid oxidation, using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARSs), revealed that the OC and OCEL groups exhibited markedly lower values than both the control (CON) and the linseed-only (EL) groups, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

In a linear model with “Sex”, “Julian date”, and “Year” (continuous variable), the year parameter estimate was highly significant (t = −7.6, p < 0.001), representing 13.8% reduction of the calf body mass during 1992–2018.

Chi-square test showed a highly significant association between ABCD4 genotype distribution and vertebral phenotypes (overall χ 2 = 76.86, df = 6, p < 0.001; Table 3 ).

The result showed a highly significant logistic component [ t (48) = 44.31, p > 0.001] consistent with the presence of a category boundary (Harnad, 1987 ) (see Figure 2 ).

Repeated measures ANOVA for reaction times revealed a highly significant main effect of congruency ( F (1,14) = 41.72; p < 0.001), while there was neither a significant main effect of group ( F (1,14) = 2.02; p = 0.18) nor a congruency by group interaction ( F (1,14) = 0.001; p = 0.97).

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001). 4 Discussion The goal in obtaining these molecules is not only to maximize their extraction but also to ensure that they retain their activities for future application and use.

The overall differences between pathogen loading values across severity groups were highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis test; p < 0.001).

Year, cultivar, and their interaction were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and explained much of the variance of most of the traits.

p-values were all highly significant (p < 0.001) for comparisons of 27°C vs. 23°C and 31°C vs. 27°C (each a 4°C increase), as well as for 31°C vs. 23°C (8°C increase, Additional file 9 : Table S7).

Litter size (LS) The linear model run to select the significant effects showed highly significant effects for genotype (P < 0.001), oestrus type (P < 0.01), flock (P < 0.001), month of lambing (P < 0.001) and the composite effect or physiological status of the dam at lambing (P < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant ( P < .001), indicating a greater PAR reduction per treatment month in the more recently treated group. 3.5.

0.31, n = 13) for Alouatta , a highly significant difference (p<0.001, t test).

There was a highly significant difference in cell length between the developmental phases ( X 2 = 234.44; d.f. 2; p < 0.001), which a posthoc Dunn test indicated was significant between each developmental phase (p < 0.001).

The complete model was highly significant (χ 2 =8869.1, p<0.001).

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a highly significant difference in BDI ( P < .001), HAM-A ( P < .01) and in NRS ( P = .004) (Table 2 ).