Furthermore, this group contained the highest percentage of ever smokers (81.5%); however, this was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.070).
← all phrases
“marginally insignificant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
Our data showed that following chlorella supplementation, the heart rate was lower throughout all quartiles of the submaximal test; however, it was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.07). l -Arginine has been demonstrated to augment cardiac vagal control in healthy individuals [ 43 ], along with exhibiting a negative chronotropic effect in patients with chronic heart failure [ 44 ].
Out of the HSP genes examined, HSPA2 and DNAJB6 were not found to show any expression differences between body condition states, although HSPA2 showed a 1.6-fold change but was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.07).
The difference in gluteus maximus density was only marginally insignificant (p=0.07).
Of interest was the fact that there was a marginally insignificant medium-sized effect between medium and high gaming skill levels on the performance in the visuospatial short-term memory task [ d = 0.57, p = 0.070].
However, the total effect was marginally insignificant ( b* = 0.064, p = 0.071).
S2c ) and a marginally insignificant trend of less symbiont photosynthate assimilation ( F =3.00, P =0.072; Fig. 3C ), which resulted in less host photosynthate assimilation at the highest temperature relative to 25°C controls ( T =3.04, P =0.044; Fig. 3E ).
However, while the difference from t 1 to t 3 and t 2 to t 3 was significant in effective respondents ( p < 0.05), the difference was marginally insignificant in the focused subgroup ( p = 0.0749; Table 3 ).
In addition, the main effect of the light regime on cercarial emergence was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.078; Table 1 ) as the species tended to have increased cercarial emergence during dark or night time (Fig. 1 ).
Disperse Puberty_2 samples at age 14 showed significantly more internalizing behavior at the same age without accounting for covariates (estimate = 0.4 and adjusted p = 0.02), while the difference became marginally insignificant after considering covariates (estimate = 0.3 and adjusted p = 0.079).
In addition, metabolic rate increased by 0.02 ± 0.01 mL O 2 h −1 with each additional limb that was missing, though this effect was marginally insignificant ( t = 1.76, p = 0.08) and decreased by 0.02 ± 0.01 mL O 2 h −1 with each additional missing limb that was regenerating, though this effect was again marginally insignificant ( t = −1.95, p = 0.053).
Whilst Farm 2 had lower average parity than Farms 1 and 3, this was marginally insignificant (Farm 1, system A = 3.12 ± SE 0.12; Farm 2, system B = 2.48 ± SE 0.21; Farm 3, system C = 2.96 ± SE 0.24 and system D 2.93 ± SE0.11, F 3,115 =2.31, P = 0.080, from LMM).
All estimates of socioeconomic status were inversely and significantly correlated with ReVA, except objective material status, which had a marginally insignificant result (r = −0.05, p = 0.080 and r = −0.05, p = 0.077).
Analysis of the Framingham study [ 39 ] data showed that the presence of microalbuminuria above the median, ≥ 3.9 μg/mg in men and ≥ 7.5 μg/mg in women, was associated with a threefold increased risk of CVD (adjusted HR 2.92, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.44, p < 0.001) and for a marginally insignificant increase in total mortality (adjusted HR 1.75, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.22, p = 0.08) compared to those with a lower-than-average UACR.
In the central 2 mm zone, the median epithelial thickness for healthy thick corneas was 52.49 μm (range, 50.36 to 54.22 μm), while for KC corneas it was 50.62 μm (range, 44.74 to 52.66 μm). Surprisingly, the difference between the two groups was marginally insignificant ( P = 0.08).
The timing of down‐migration was more variable for non‐natal than natal fish in six of the 8 years in which both strategies were present ( p < 0.01), and the mean date of down‐migration was more variable inter‐annually for non‐natal than natal fish, though this effect was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.08).
As for the three variables reflecting residents’ perceptions of the community environment, except for Factor 1 in Model 1, which was marginally insignificant ( p -value = 0.081), the other three variables consistently showed statistical significance across all models, with relatively small fluctuations in the range of their regression coefficients (see Table 5 ). 4.
Although this was confirmed by the univariable regression analysis (coefficient = −0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.31 to −0.05, P = 0.035), when adjusted for age and history of ophthalmic surgery, the results became marginally insignificant (coefficient = −0.59, 95% CI = −1.24 to 0.07, P = 0.082).
The incidence of nausea and/or vomiting was higher in the BID group (14.0%) than in the QID group (3.8%); however, this difference was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.089).
In months 4–10 before fracture non‐PSG horses had significantly more (11%–31%) high‐speed furlongs than the control horses; but 15% marginally insignificant fewer furlongs in the month before fracture ( p = 0.09).
Interestingly, we also found a marginally insignificant difference between the low and medium groups ( t (42) = 2.77, P = .09, η 2 = 0.154), hinting that both low and high groups display priming effects in the dynamic, vivid imagery conditions, when compared to the medium-vividness group ( Fig. 4 ).
That said, there was a marginally insignificant trend ( p = 0.1) whereby Leptospira prevalence seemed to be higher in the spring than in the autumn (PR = 4.9, CI 95% [0.9, 91]) and in males versus females (PR = 3.4, CI 95% [0.9, 22]). 3.4 Spatial distribution of rodents and cattle farms The individuals testing positive for Leptospira ( via PCR o
However, total phytoplankton abundance showed only a marginally insignificant trend ( p < 0.1), across the altitude gradient, while eukaryotic algal abundance remained largely unaffected by altitude ( p > 0.1) ( Fig. 6 a).
We reported results as significant when P ≤ 0.05 and as marginally insignificant when 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.
Food elimination was marginally insignificant ( p = 0.10844).