Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP>0.051.0× alphagold
Microzooplankton biomass, however, differed significantly among treatments (ANOVA, treatment effect: F 5, 28 = 2.4; P = 0.05, block effect: F 5, 28 = 2.2; P>0.05, no interaction effect, Figure 1B ); however, only one planned contrast, which tested the effects of stickleback ecology, was marginally significant (all others P>0.05): the generalist (G) treatment had higher biomass of microzooplankton than the no fish (NF) treatment (planned contrast t-test: t 10.3 = −2.13, P = 0.02, Table 1 ).
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Supplementary Table 2 reports the parameter estimates for the same moderators using non-PVC data, which shows the same pattern of results, but a heightened effect of BMI such that males show a marginally significant or trending relationship between higher BMI and greater tau accumulation in left Braak56 ( β = -0.746, p = 0.05) in right Braak34 ( β = -0.614, p = 0.09). 4.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Moderator analysis The effect sizes between routine disruptions and psychiatric symptoms were significant for physical activity ( r = 0.06, p < 0.01), sleep ( r = 0.10, p = 0.03), unspecified generic routines ( r = 0.26, p < 0.001), and combined multiple routines ( r = 0.21, p < 0.01) and marginally significant for eating ( r = 0.11, p = 0.05) and smoking ( r = 0.05, p = 0.05).
marginally significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
When comparing the effects of low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy and manual lymphatic drainage, there were no significant differences, except for a marginally significant reduction of pain which was greater with low-frequency low-intensity electrotherapy than with manual lymphatic drainage (13.1 vs. 1.07 mm) ( P = 0.05).
marginally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
For the hypothesized main effect of vWM on hippocampal gray matter density the analysis yielded two marginally significant clusters just above a TFCE-corrected significance threshold of p < 0.05 (left: k = 132, p = 0.05, x = −38, y = −28, z = −15, TFCE = 203.05, η 2 cluster = 0.18; right: k = 50, p = 0.07, x = 38, y = −24, z = −18, TFCE = 181.78, η 2 cluster = 0.23).