“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant difference in the percentage receiving surgery in the high-LMR groups vs low-LMR group ( P = 0.05) as well as in race between both groups ( P = 0.05).

Using “feedback on behavior” yielded a marginally significant effect on HbA1c change ( β = −0.31, p = 0.05).

There was a marginally significant interaction between group and hemisphere ( F (2,24) = 3.07, p = .05).

Interestingly, there was a marginally significant difference on the measure of environmental health t (76) = −2.041, p = .05.

In the model including all men regardless of diabetes status, the association between testosterone and AMI was marginally significant in the age-adjusted analysis (HR = 0.950 95%CI 0.90–1.00, p = 0.050).

For diastolic d-BP, although multivariate analysis detected marginally significant time-of-day differences in 2 of the 6 age groups (one-way ANOVA, P < 0.05), post hoc analyses found only one significant difference (Tukey’s test, adjusted P < 0.05) across all 2-h time bin comparisons ( SI Appendix , Fig.

Vasopressor-free days showed a marginally significant difference between the low and usual dose groups [3(0–46) vs 3(0–50);p = 0.05].

This difference in frequency was marginally significant ( P = 0.05, Chi square test).

normoxic) was marginally significant for urinary metabolomes ( p = 0.05), but not for fecal metabolomes.

1 ; the infected brother showed more attrition compared to sham in 9 out of 11 pair-wise comparisons) and infected females also showed a marginally significant difference from controls (Z = −1.75, N = 10, P = 0.05; Fig. 1 ; the infected sister showed more attrition than sham in 4 out of 5 pair-wise comparisons).

These analyses revealed a marginally significant main effect of critical IOI on guessing rate (F(2,36) = 3.26, p = 0.0501, ƞ p 2 = 0.15); guessing rate was lower with longer critical IOIs ( Fig 3 ).

In the validation dataset, the high moderate- and high-risk groups showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0501).

At posttest, the difference between the intervention and control groups is marginally significant ( p = 0.0501).

schmidlii , we found 18 infected females and 5 infected males, which shows a marginally significant trend in the infection between the sexes (6.7 and 2.5%, respectively; Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.0502).

This difference was not significant (Wilcoxon, p = .1305), but it became marginally significant by removing the outlier (t-test p = .0502) ( Table 4 ).

Our analysis showed that for disease-free survival, low VHL level was marginally significant on univariate analysis ( P = 0.0502, Fig. 1 ).

The ANCOVA reveals only a marginally significant main effect of Interaction Partner, F(2,104) = 3.082, p = 0.0502, no main effect of Toddler Gender, F(1,102) = 0.007, p = 0.931, and no significant interaction, F(2,104) = 1.22, p = 0.298.

The decrease in TEER was marginally significant ( P = 0.0502) compared to the control.

The interaction was significant at position 2, b = −0.61220, SE = 0.26911, z = −2.275, p = .0229, and position 4, b = −0.70490, SE = 0.24750, z = −2.848, p < .01, and marginally significant at position 1, b = −0.46395, SE = 0.23688, z = −1.959, p = .0502.

For wPLI, changes remained significant or marginally significant at 4 h ( p = 0.0502), 12 h ( p = 0.027), and 1 day ( p = 0.027) in the broadband range and at 1 day in the theta band ( p = 0.002) compared to the baseline.

In the apical turn, density at day 28 is significantly lower from day 10 (significant effect of day in a parametric model, p = 0.0120; pairwise comparison on least squares means for the effect of day with Tukey adjustment, p = 0.0148) The difference between day 10 and day 56 in apical neuron density was marginally significant ( p = 0.0503), but the difference between day 28 and day 56 was non-significant ( p = 0.96).

There was no significant difference between the groups, except that there were more female lambs in the DUV 0.02 mg/kg dose group, and this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.0503).

Lower, marginally significant among-group variation was observed between New Mexico and the Midwest region within the native range (22% , P = 0.0503).

Retrospective thought questionnaire Following correction for multiple comparisons, a negative association between proportion of time that ADHD group spent thinking about the future and 24hr memory retention was marginally significant (adjusted p = 0.0504).

A One-Way ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of the three conditions in the total disruption duration [ F (2, 28) = 3.33, p = 0.0504, p rep = 0.92, η 2 p = 0.19].