Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
For infants tested in Paris, the Stimulus Type X Habituation type interaction was marginally significant (F(1,30) = 3.53, p = 0.06), as infants habituated to scale-invariant sounds looked significantly longer to switch than to same trials (Scheffé post hoc: p = 0.02), but infants habituated to variable-scale sounds did not differ in their looks to the two trial types (Scheffé post hoc: p = 0.81).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
After the phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), the negative linear relationships were still significant in 2018 (R 2 = 0.34, p < 0.05) and marginally significant in 2019 (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.06), which indicated that the phylogenetic effect did not change the trade-off relationships ( Table S1 ).
marginally significantP=0·061.2× alphagold
The results were consistent with a similar study that was completed on healthy individuals with vitamin D deficiency and had revealed both treatment regimens significantly increased the serum 25- hydroxyl vitamin D level with a marginally significant trend in favor of oral (P=0·06) ( 28 ).
marginally significantp ≤ 0.061.2× alphagold
With the addition of BMI, Step 2 was marginally significant, ΔR 2 = 0.04, F(2, 82) = 11.88, p ≤ 0.06, such that greater BMI was associated with greater SDRT, with BMI accounting for a marginal incremental amount of variance in incongruent RT variability beyond the associated descriptive variables, β = 0.19, t (82) = 1.93, p = 0.006.
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
When NH participants were tested monaurally, the difference between congruent and incongruent trials was no longer present ( z = 0.48, p = .63), though a comparison with the binaural listening condition yielded a marginally significant difference (congruency and listening condition, X 2 (2) = 3.52, p = .06), and their CE did not differ from that measured among uHL, bCI, and uCI users (all ps > .19).
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
The SI values for the non-rewarded cue were also elevated in preterm mice (Term NR =0.11 ± 0.19, Preterm NR = 0.2 ± 0.07), but the differences in their distribution between term and preterm mice were marginally significant (K-S test, D = 0.41, p = 0.06), likely due to the low number of significantly modulated neurons (Term=16 and Preterm=23).