Also, two factors, number of relapses and CRS grade, were shown to have significant relations to MRD-negative CR ( p < 0.05, Tables 2 , 3 ), while the relation between CRS grade and CR was marginally significant ( p = 0.06, Table 3 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Beyond that, the post-hoc comparison following the Games-Howell procedure revealed that the difference between assimilation and marginalization was marginally significant for anger-in ( p = 0.06).
This was not true for INT concepts, where no differences between those conditions were found (agents: M = 3.01, SE = 0.22, non-agents: M = 2.54, SE = 0.23), even though a similar, but marginally significant trend was observed (p = .06).
Dietary intake across rs2287161 genotypes We found a marginally significant difference in vegetables ( P = 0.06) across rs2287161 genotypes.
For infants tested in Paris, the Stimulus Type X Habituation type interaction was marginally significant (F(1,30) = 3.53, p = 0.06), as infants habituated to scale-invariant sounds looked significantly longer to switch than to same trials (Scheffé post hoc: p = 0.02), but infants habituated to variable-scale sounds did not differ in their looks to the two trial types (Scheffé post hoc: p = 0.81).
Nevertheless, there is a marginally significant difference in Ln LF values of HTA subjects during different experimental phases [ F (2,47) = 3.01, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.22].
After the phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs), the negative linear relationships were still significant in 2018 (R 2 = 0.34, p < 0.05) and marginally significant in 2019 (R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.06), which indicated that the phylogenetic effect did not change the trade-off relationships ( Table S1 ).
The difference between ES and NS was marginally significant (H = 3.57, p = 0.06).
Manipulation check As Table 2 shows, for absolute change in mean values for the motive of kin care before and after the intervention, ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of the group assignment [ F (2, 966) = 11.274, p = 0.06].
Calculated p -values for the interaction between time and redemption status were significant for the coordination of care subscale ( p = 0.02) and total P3C score ( p = 0.01), and marginally significant for the communication subscale ( p = 0.06).
The positive association between 2′FL and the REEF found in the exclusively breastfed group was now marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
The results were consistent with a similar study that was completed on healthy individuals with vitamin D deficiency and had revealed both treatment regimens significantly increased the serum 25- hydroxyl vitamin D level with a marginally significant trend in favor of oral (P=0·06) ( 28 ).
The reduction was statistically significant in adar2(RNAi) animals (p < 0.05) and marginally significant in adar1(RNAi) animals (p = 0.06).
Seedling growth response showed a similar trend that was marginally significant, with seedling growth decreasing as the initial seedling density increased ( p = .06, Figure 2b ; Table 2 ).
There was a significant difference among the groups in CES-D level ( F (4,95) = 3.38, p = .012) and a marginally significant difference in trajectory (appraisal group by months interaction F (4,386) = 2.24, p = .06).
According to the logistic regression model, BMT prior to RT was also associated with marginally significant increased rate of CR following RT (OR = 0.099, 95% CI = 0.0086-1.135, P = 0.06).
Age showed a marginally significant association with an MLR estimator ( β = −0.06, p = 0.06) and a very weak association with a WLSMV estimator ( β = −0.17, p < 0.001), suggesting that problematic celebrity fanship may decrease with age.
Authoritative parenting practice showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.06) by adolescent sex, with a higher authoritative score among parents of boys.
With the addition of BMI, Step 2 was marginally significant, ΔR 2 = 0.04, F(2, 82) = 11.88, p ≤ 0.06, such that greater BMI was associated with greater SDRT, with BMI accounting for a marginal incremental amount of variance in incongruent RT variability beyond the associated descriptive variables, β = 0.19, t (82) = 1.93, p = 0.006.
Of the beetles fed on dung, only time seemed to be marginally significant ( F = 3.32; P = 0.06).
When NH participants were tested monaurally, the difference between congruent and incongruent trials was no longer present ( z = 0.48, p = .63), though a comparison with the binaural listening condition yielded a marginally significant difference (congruency and listening condition, X 2 (2) = 3.52, p = .06), and their CE did not differ from that measured among uHL, bCI, and uCI users (all ps > .19).
In the ACC of facial recognition, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between musical emotion level and measure ( F (2, 60) = 3.46, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.06).
The effect of S1 on wrestling behavior was marginally significant (df = 10, t = 2.13, p = 0.06).
The SI values for the non-rewarded cue were also elevated in preterm mice (Term NR =0.11 ± 0.19, Preterm NR = 0.2 ± 0.07), but the differences in their distribution between term and preterm mice were marginally significant (K-S test, D = 0.41, p = 0.06), likely due to the low number of significantly modulated neurons (Term=16 and Preterm=23).
B2B2 is marginally significant dedicator (P=0.06).