Indeed, there was a marginally significant difference in agency index between the synchronous and asynchronous conditions (χ 2 = 3.32, df = 1, n = 20, P = 0.069), if another statistical criterion was applied to the data.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
This broadband increase was marginally significant [ t (32) = 1.89, p = 0.069].
The difference between high and low-risk groups ( M = 3.44, SD = 2.40) was marginally significant ( p = 0.069).
Finally, in the last time window (220–240 ms), the larger pseudoword than word response that was found to be fully significant in signal space, was confirmed as a marginally significant difference in the left temporal activation (F(1, 17) = 3.78, p = 0.069).
In contrast, food supplementation led to a marginally significant increase in the larval pupation rate of Ae. aegypti from 0% without food to 12.0% after adding food ( Z = 1.82, P = 0.069, Fig. 6 C and Table 1 ), but did not change the pupation rate of Ae. albopictus —the pupation rate remained at 0% (Fig. 6 D and Table 1 ).
Results showed a marginally significant effect of Intervention ( F (1,4) = 6.11, p = 0.069) but no significant effects of Phase or Intervention × Phase.
In the mesic grasslands, sheep exhibited a stronger positive selection of species with higher forage indicator value compared to dry grasslands (marginally significant P = 0.069), and also selected species with greater canopy height but substantially less strongly than in the dry grasslands.
A marginally significant relationship remained ( r AB|C = 0.396, P = 0.069).
To investigate the relationship of whether changes in beta within hard trials related to trial success, we created a difference score (early-late; lower scores indicated decreased beta in earlier compared to late segments) and correlated it with hard trial success, which was marginally significant ( r = 0.26, p = 0.069).
existential threat intergroup conflict political attitudes Israel Science Foundation 10.13039/501100003977 427/13 United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation 10.13039/100006221 2007230 The analyses indicated that Israeli in-group identification was associated with lower support of compromise [ b = -0.37, SE = 0.08, t = 4.49, p < 0.001, 95% CI for b (-0.53, -0.21)], greater perceptions of the Palestinians as homogenous [marginally significant; b = 0.15, SE = 0.08, t = 1.83, p = 0.069, 95% CI for b (-0.04, 0.27)], and less trust of the Palestinians [ b = -0.20, SE = 0.10, t = -2.02, p = 0.043, 95% CI for b (-0.40, -0.01)].
In the right hemisphere ROI, there was a marginally significant main effect of group for relative delta power, F(2,55) = 2.796, p = 0.069.
Results of Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests further demonstrated that while the South region score had marginally significant differences with the Northwest region score ( Δ mean = 0.98, SE = 0.39, P = 0.069) and the West region score ( Δ mean = 0.86, SE = 0.35, P = 0.078), there was no significant difference between any two of these four regions (see Table S2 for all descriptive statistics).
An independent samples t-test revealed a marginally significant difference in ASK-MI scores between patients and HCPs (mean difference = −1.24, df = 82, p = 0.069, two-tailed).
Type III tests of fixed effects reported significant main effects of SI type ( F (1, 53.474) = 5.22, p = 0.026) and Group ( F (1, 23.916) = 14.079, p < 0.001) with a marginally significant interaction between the two factors ( F (1, 55.579) = 3.439, p = 0.069).
The analysis of first pass with no regression times revealed a marginally significant interaction between the two factors (β = 31.95, SE = 17.52, t = 1.82, p = 0.069).
Patients with high serum miRNA-125b expression showed a marginally significant increase in OS time ( P = 0.069) (Fig. 4 B).
Controlling for these factors, the effect of CAPS on the subjective-value signal of ambiguous losses in ventral striatum remained significant (multi-factor ANOVA by GLM: F (1, 33) = 6.01, p < 0.05); the effect on risky gains in vmPFC was marginally significant ( F (1, 33) = 3.53, p = 0.069).
The interaction between load and group was marginally significant [ F (1, 38) = 3.514, p = 0.069], with a lower accuracy rate in the HA group than in the LA group on the 2‐back task ( p = 0.055) (Table 1 , Figure 2 ).
The global test revealed significant relationship between species distribution and environmental variables (model 2, p = 0.004) and marginally significant relationship between species composition and functional traits (model 4, p = 0.069).
On the other hand, the effect of arousal was marginally significant, suggesting that words with high arousal values were recognized faster than those with low arousal values, β = −1.34, SE = 0.74, t = −1.82, p = .069.
Statistical analysis of the onset latencies of response-locked LPRs revealed a marginally significant effect of response cue validity ( F c (1, 17) = 3.8, p = .069).
FSH increased (6.54 mlU/ml) compared to an increase (1.76 mlU/ml) in placebo group, which was marginally significant (p=0.069).
The correlation between age and hours spent online was marginally significant ( r = −0.104, p = 0.069).
The Ca ZPG estimate for Daphnia was marginally significant at 21 °C ( p = 0.069), being 0.17 ± 0.02 (SE) mg Ca L −1 with a 95% confidence interval that crosses zero (−0.07–0.41).
This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 5.36, df = 2, P = 0.069) and was likely a function of the reproductive assurance secured by selfing hermaphrodites when mates became limiting.