“marginally significant”

Finally, we found a marginally significant interaction between the time and condition, t(157) = −1.84, p = .07, with the change over time being positively steeper in the virtual patient condition.

There was a statistically significant main effect of reading ( F (1,41) = 7.91, p < .01, and marginally significant interactions of reading and medial-lateral ( F (4,164) = 2.78, p < .07, HF ε = .53) and reading and anterior-posterior ( F (4,164) = 3.13, p < .07, HF ε = .36).

Regarding the two pandemic-related beliefs, government efficacy accounted for a significant addition (0.8%) of the variance in PSU (Δ F = 4.82, p = 0.03) beyond the variance explained by demographic variables; in contrast, self-efficacy only explained a marginally significant increment (0.6%) of the variance in PSU (Δ F = 3.34, p = 0.07).

The ∆TDQ scores reached a marginally significant difference between the MB and NoMB groups (∆TDQ score: −1.2 and −2.7 in the MB and NoMB groups, respectively; p = 0.07) ( Table 2 ).

There was a marginally significant difference in initial sputum culture positivity between the two groups ( P = 0.07), with DM+ being more likely to present with a positive sputum culture.

Compared with the WT group, a marginally significant difference was detected in TRT (235 ± 6 μm) ( N = 11) in the 5XFAD group ( p = 0.07).

In the multivariate model, gender was marginally significant, with women less likely to report transactional sex than men (AOR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04–1.14, p = 0.07).

This did not interact with ASD outcome group ( F( 2,49) = 0.88, p = 0.42, ρ 2 = 0.04), remained marginally significant if responses to objects were covaried (F(1,49) = 3.44, p = 0.07, ρ 2 = 0.07), and was not present for other components of Surgency (S2.2.2).

Furthermore, a marginally significant difference in DTI-ALPS left was observed between the post-RT-RE+ and post-RT-RE− groups ( p = 0.07).

The main effect of the group is marginally significant, F (1, 46) = 3.34, p = 0.07, partial η 2 = 0.07, and the N2 amplitude in the music training group was marginally greater than that in the control group. 3.2.2 P3 Results on P3 showed a main effect of group, F (1, 46) = 13.68, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.23.

ATX-A content was significantly (F-test; R 2 = −0.43, p < 0.01; Figure 4B ) negatively correlated with growth rate, while ATX-A content exhibited a positive, marginally significant (F-test; R 2 = 0.26, p < 0.07; Figure 4C ) correlation with N 2 fixation rate.

The interaction between trial type and age group was marginally significant, F (1,20) = 3.58, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.15.

In step 3 models in the BA condition, only change in weight was a marginally significant predictor ( p = .07).

Infants in the 2 groups were comparable on demographic parameters, except for a marginally significant difference in the need for resuscitation between infants born to advanced age mothers and the comparison group (7.2% vs 3.6%, P = .07).

The NBRM predicting IJA_high from group was marginally significant (χ (2) 2 = 5.1, p = .07).

When the not significant Incompatibility × Internal motivation, B = -0.20, SE = 0.15, p = 0.191, was entered into the model, the Incompatibility × External motivation interaction remained marginally significant, B = -0.21, SE = 0.11, p = 0.070.

NRF was marginally significant ( F 2,81 = 2.73, P = 0.07) across the different grassland types, with the highest NRF (mean: 47.19%) in meadow, followed by steppe (mean: 35.20%) and desert steppe (mean: 17.90%; Appendix S2: Table S6 ).

We observed a marginally significant effect indicating that Utilitarian claims are negatively related to participants subjective taste ratings (coefficient: −0.7428, P = 0.07, obtained from linear regression using clustered standard errors at the session level).

Anger The ostracism manipulation produced a marginally significant effect on anger, F (2, 71) = 2.74, p< .07, η p 2 = .07.

When split for following self and following other trials, the interaction effect on RT between current and previous congruency was marginally significant following self [ F (1,19) = 3.67, p = 0.070], and marginally significant following other [ F (1,19) = 3.07, p = 0.096].

There were no significant correlations between the relevance and difficulty ratings except in the needle rotation task, where we found a marginally significant negative correlation ( r (28) = −0.3, p = 0.07).

The effects of predator exposure also showed a marginally significant interaction with the season ( p = .07).

longifolia ), there was a marginally significant greater leaf area in the exotic range ( P = 0.07, 0.06 respectively, Table 5 ).

Assessment of Opportunity Costs and Placebo Effects The counseling group increased the number of performed cognitive, physical, and social leisure activity types (excluding JP solving) by 1.4, which is a marginally significant increase relative to the JP group ( p = 0.07).

However, the marginally significant effect of size ( F 1,228 = 3.36, P = 0.07) suggests that size is at best weakly associated with fast-start swimming performance.