“marginally significant”

Changes (post‐pre) in scores for all clinical and psychological variables were statistically significant ( P < .05) except DSST, which showed a marginally significant increase ( P = .071). 3.2.

When analyses were repeated using Spearman rho correlation, four associations remained significant (see Table 2 ), including the associations between Proximity and OXTR binding in the total presubiculum (ρ = − 0.83, p = 0.01), Contact and OXTR binding in the total presubiculum (ρ = − 0.83, p = 0.01), Proximity and OXTR binding in PSB3 (ρ = − 0.88, p = 0.004), and Contact and OXTR binding density in PSB3 (ρ = − 0.88, p = 0.004); the associations between OXTR binding in PSB1 and Proximity and Contact were marginally significant ( p = 0.071; see Table 2 ).

Adding the CBCL peer relations scale to the CBCL Total problem scale regression model led to a decrease in β from 1.75 to 0.97, remaining marginally significant ( β = 0.97, p = 0.071, CI − 0.08 to 2.01, R 2 = 0.30), indicating that CBCL total problem T scores are influenced by the peer relations scale, but remain higher in older presenters compared to younger presenters.

Couples who described their relationship with their children at baseline in less negative terms, showed a marginally significant benefit from participating in the TRUE Dads groups ( t = 1.38; p = 0.071), while those entering the study with highly negative relationships with their child significantly improved this relationship if they were in the intervention condition ( t = −3.041; p = 0.023).

After further adjustment for physical activity, the significant association remained in men aged 19‒34 years ( p = 0.009), while a marginally significant association was found in women of the same age range ( p = 0.071). 4.

Further, the difference between L1 Mismatch and control was marginally significant for AHE [ b = 0.71, χ 2 (1) = 7.57, p = 0.071] but not for NE [ b = 0.50, χ 2 (1) = 0.00, p = 1.00].

Mouth breathing showed a marginally significant association that attenuated after full adjustment (P = 0.071).

The main effect of GROUP was marginally significant, F (2, 84) = 2.73, p = 0.071, an effect that was carried by ASD having significantly weaker responses than TD, t (84) = –2.13, p = 0.04, and marginally significantly weaker responses than ADHD, t (84) = 1.70, p = 0.09.

In addition, a higher degree of tumor differentiation was also marginally significant (OR = 1.2, P = 0.071).

Managerial experience was marginally significant (p = 0.0712), hinting at a potential moderating role.

For P23 mice, the 4-way interaction of group × sex × side × depth (all depth coefficients included) was marginally significant ( P = 0.0712) based on a likelihood ratio test.

There was a marginally significant correlation between effect size of APB and BPB to IPPT (slope = 0.30, P = 0.0715; Figure 4B ; Supplementary Table 2 ).

glycines -susceptible cultivar, the aphid density treatment factor had a marginally significant effect ( F = 3.59; df = 2,9; P = 0.0715) on numbers of females plant −1 with H. glycines population densities decreasing with increasing aphid density ( Fig. 1 ).

The association between exercise and LC-dACC connectivity was marginally significant (β= .34, p = 0.0717).

This effect was driven by a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.0718) between those in the activities condition and those in the Own Methods condition across all time points Observed PHQ-9 scores showed that from baseline to follow-up 321 participants decreased their scores (range of decrease: 1–23 points), 66 participants maintained the same score, and 77 increased their scores (range of increase: 1–17 points).

Effect of geographical distance on beta diversity after controlling for environmental variables The observed partial correlation coefficients of beta diversity with geographical distance (coordination) after controlling environmental heterogeneity were significant for total bryophytes ( r = .1493, p < .001), total mosses ( r = .1432, p < .001), liverworts ( r = .090, p < .02), pleurocarpous mosses ( r = .1257, p < .005), and marginally significant for acrocarpous mosses ( r = .0471, p = .072) (Table 3 ).

Results from the Sobel test showed that discriminability was the mediator between the duration of the ongoing task and EBPM performance, z = -1.65, p = 0.052 (marginally significant), while self-reminding was not, z = -1.14, p = 0.072 ( Table 6 ).

IBI intercept was a marginally significant predictor in the overall model, F (2,48) = 2.78, p = 0.072.

There was also a marginally significant decrease in the mean tear volume averaged for both eyes with diphenhydramine ( t [31] = 1.864, p = 0.072).

Between the 32 study subjects and the 14 drop-outs, the proportion of those aged 75 or older was higher among the drop-outs (93%) than among the subjects (63%), and this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.072).

There was a significant decrease in the ROS levels from 2254 ± 245 to 1457 ± 245 in the BSE group ( p = 0.013) accompanied by no change in the placebo group, demonstrating marginally significant interactions between treatment and visits (ß = −805, p = 0.072).

Intra‐hemispheric strength showed a marginally significant correlation with the SRS‐2 T‐score ( R = 0.12, p = 0.072, FDR‐adjusted), while clustering coefficient ( R = 0.15, p = 0.038, FDR‐adjusted) and global efficiency ( R = 0.14, p = 0.038, FDR‐adjusted) were significantly and positively correlated with the VABS communication subscale.

Furthermore, there was a marginally significant interaction for both block and group ( F (10,330) = 1.733, p = 0.072).

Differences between conditions with respect to education were also marginally significant F (3, 1994) = 2.33, p = .072.

As predicted, there was a larger decrease in blood pressure in the disconfirming confederate condition relative to the confirming confederate condition, in the post-confederate-reaction period from minutes 19–24 (-1.09 mmHg/minute vs -0.19 mmHg/minute), a marginally significant difference, B = -0.90, z = -1.80, p = 0.072.