“marginally significant”

We found a significant interaction between group and item related to biological properties [F (2, 86) = 3.414, P<.04], and a marginally significant interaction with perceptual properties [F (2, 86) = 2.714, P<.08].

We found that the free-ratio model fit the data better although this was marginally significant (p = 0.08).

Encapsulation of directly accessible interior caulk yielded a marginally significant (p = 0.08) reduction in the normalized median indoor air PCB concentration (22%, 282 to 220 ng/m 3 ).

Activity in the aVS was not significant during positive violation trials relative to confirmatory trials [ t (16) = 0.86, p = 0.20], but exhibited marginally significant increases during negative violation trials compared to confirmatory trials [ t (16) = 1.49, p = 0.08].

However, results for experimental studies using these effect sizes suggested only a marginally significant 15% ( p = 0.08) increase in the odds of a police‐reported repeat incident, compared to a statistically significant 22% increase in the original analysis.

Using the directional Steiger Z-test, we found, for fornix MD, that there was a marginally significant difference between the two correlations obtained for scenes and faces ( z (26) = 1.39, p = 0.08).

Sex/Age in the Swedish CF population When limiting the analyses to the present Swedish CF sample and to data simulating the Swedish general population [ 17 , 21 ], a Group (CF-patient/general population) × Sex interaction effect on Anxiety was found to be marginally significant, F (1, 925) = 3.07, p = .080, η 2 = .003.

inconsistent) × 6 (electrode sites: F1, FZ, F2, FC1, FCZ, FC2) design reveals that the main effect of information comprehensibility is marginally significant, F (1, 22) = 23.74, p = 0.08, the main effect of information consistency is not significant, F (1, 22) = 0.10, p = 0.75, the interaction effect between information comprehensibility and information consistency is significant, F (1, 22) = 12.17, p < 0.001, the main effect of electrode sites is significant, F (1, 22) = 5.49, p = 0.003, showing no interaction effect between information comprehensibility and electrode sites, F (1, 22) = 0.64, p = 0.68, and no interaction effect between information consistency and electrode sites, F (1, 22) = 0.44, p = 0.82.

This sex difference was marginally significant, p = .08, d = 0.66.

However, the difference in overall survival was marginally significant either between ypT0 and ypT2/3 (P=0.08) or between ypT0 and ypT1 patients (P=0.051).

The difference between these SARs was marginally significant (p = 0.08 by Fisher exact test), and the susceptibility reduction was 1 – SAR 1 b /SAR 0 b = 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] –60.5% to 96.1%).

Voice quality before swallowing did not show any significant results, except for a marginally significant result ( p = 0.08) in the first swallow attempt.

CVS There was a marginally significant AI-by-time interaction (OR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.03, P = 0.08).

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy showed association with increased risk of TEE, which was marginally significant (HR, 3.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 15.43; p=0.08).

The correlations were positive and they were marginally significant for Mary’s perception ( r (24) = .362, p = .08) and significant for Jack’s knowledge ( r (24) = .601, p < .001).

Furthermore, the main effect for body location was marginally significant ( F 2,120 =2.52, P =.08, η p 2 =.04).

The effect of cTBS in the preliminary experiment For the preliminary experiment of inpatients, a marginally significant time × group interaction was observed in the YBOCS score ( F = 3.25, p = 0.08; η 2 = 0.07; Fig. 2A ).

However, in the multivariable regression model, the interval between symptom onset and admission was not significant ( P = .14) and age was marginally significant ( P = .08).

There was a moderate, marginally significant correlation between these ratings and how often Directors used each intended superordinate: r (18) = .39, 95% CI = [−.06, .71], p = .08).

There was a marginally significant difference (p=0.08) at 14-day TB treatment initiation between the GXP and SOC phases but no difference at 28-days.

All treatments resulted in slightly higher net N mineralization rates, the increase after N addition was marginally significant (p = 0.08, Fig. 2c ).

M sink-slower = 0.87), there was a marginally significant interaction between trial type and condition, F (4,200) = 2.08, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.04.

Comparing the programs, more BCMB alumni than GST alumni entered into academic teaching right after their PhD, while more GST alumni joined governmental science (significant by Fisher’s two-sided test) or industry (marginally significant, p = 0.08; Table 4 and Figure 2 ).

Moreover, there was a significant group main effect with controls showing higher dlPFC activation compared to remitted/R patients (F(1, 42) = 5.33, p = 0.02) and a marginally significant group effect with higher dlPFC activation for the controls vs. acute BD patients (F(1, 60) = 3.07, p = 0.08).

Machinery was consistently the leading mechanism of injury, and its increase over the study period was marginally significant ( p -value = 0.08).