“not significantly significant”

The hospitalization costs were higher in the control group (56608 Confoederatio Helvetica franc (CHF) versus 47600 CHF), but this difference was not significantly significant ( P = 0.429).

While the SBP and DBP were negatively associated with MDA in Groups 3 and 4, the difference was not significantly significant ( p > 0.5).

In this study, female gender was associated with SVR failure (OR: 3.20) but was not significantly significant (p=0.517), which may be due to the low sample size.

Analysis using a random-effects model in view of the heterogeneous results between the effect sizes (I 2 = 90%; P < 0.01) indicated that patients who underwent BKA had a slightly higher Oxford knee score than those who underwent TKA, although the difference was not significantly significant (MD = 1.06; 95% CI2.29, 4.41; P = 0.53; Fig. 2 C).

Whilst the difference in the specificity rate between the two evaluated methods was not significantly significant ( P = 0.548), the difference between sensitivity rates was significant ( P = 0.004), indicating that bleach sedimentation is more sensitive.

Individuals who remembered the date of their next visit to the ART center were more likely to be virally suppressed compared with those who did not remember the date; the difference, however, was not significantly significant (64% versus 55%, P = 0.55).

The reoperation rate at one year was lower in the CCS group at 6.3% (n = 2); however, this was not significantly significant (p = 0.588).

However, and notably, the subtle difference between the expression level of Slc14a1 in the hippocampus of the AD model rats and the control rats is not significantly significant ( p = 0.614) ( Fig 4B ).

The difference becomes slightly but not significantly significant with the subgroup B (p=0.66), reaching a statistical significance when comparing the group of non-elderly with the subgroup C (p<0.03).

The standard deviation of SVP variability for each individual varied from 0.2% to 3.7% with an overall average standard deviation of 2.6% for each participant that was not significantly significant (one-way analysis of variance; P = 0.68).

However, the difference between different stages in terms of survival rate was not significantly significant (stage I-II versus stage III; P = 0.74) [ 15 ].

Although there was a decrease is arthroplasty waste events between 2010 and 2011, the reduction was not significantly significant ( p = 0.87).

Similarly, dissolved oxygen had a negative effect on the detection of Campylobacter although the relationship is not significantly significant (p = 0.998, OR = 0, b = −22.78).

Type 2 diabetes duration was slightly higher in the participants with a positive parental history, but that finding was not significantly significant.

These not significantly significant, but we suspect this pattern is due at least in part to the stability difference between mRNA, and collagen protein, which is particularly long-lived.

In MII oocytes, it tended to be higher although not significantly significant (0.631 ± 0.197 vs 0.578 ± 0.133 for MII and GV, respectively; NS).

However, knowledge about depression and attitudes about helping people with depression were not significantly significant.

5th_Spring_2016) ( β = −0.10, p < .001), while the reverse path was not significantly significant.

However, a greater percentage of the higher-educated adults participate in formal organizations (43% vs 35%), though the difference is not significantly significant.

Other responses by size of city or town in which pharmacists practiced were not significantly significant.

Among the other predictors, sepsis (TR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.24, p = 0.06), HIV exposure status (TR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.90–1.19, p = 0.60), ANC visits (TR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.58–1.55, p = 0.83), NE (TR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85–1.32, p = 0.63), and RDS (TR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83–1.02, p = 0.11) were not significantly significant ( Table 5 ).

A Gynecological Oncology Group (GOG) study found that the ovarian metastasis rate was 1.6% for stage IB cervical adenocarcinoma and 0.5% for stage IB SCC, but the difference was not significantly significant [ 8 ].

These differences were not significantly significant.

Furthermore, we found a higher, though not significantly significant, complication rate in patients with a mutilated clitoral glans.

In low-grade glioma (LGG), ovarian cancer (OV), and sarcoma (SARC), the impact of IFN-γ expression on patient prognosis is not significantly significant (Fig. 8D–F ).