Although this relationship is not yet significant in these older adolescents, like it is in adults ( r (37) = .61, p < .001), this analysis provides initial evidence that maximization of face identification abilities when naturally freely viewing faces may continue to develop through late adolescence and even into early adulthood.
← all phrases
“not yet significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The data showed the plasma levels of ApoE in the three common genotypes were as follow: ε2/ε3 > ε3/ε3 > ε3/ε4, but there was not yet significant difference (all P > 0.05).
This is, however, not yet significant (Fisher exact test, p < 0.05).
After 36 hours, the difference between Dex and control group was not yet significant ( P >0.05) but the number of cells and the rate of growth was significantly higher in the Bio-Oss group ( P <0.05).
The change in c-reactive protein was not yet significant at 10 weeks ( p = 0.05).
Although differences were not yet significant at days 7 and 14, the ALRG group demonstrated a substantial scoring advantage starting from day 30 (MD: 1.71, p = 0.053), which had persisted through day 60 (MD: 1.71, p = 0.061).
The OD-shift after 1 day of MD to 0.10±0.02 (n = 5) was not yet significant (p = 0.054, B t-test).
Furthermore, high PD-1 expression appeared to be correlated with poor OS for patients with ESCC in the training cohort, though the data were not yet significant enough at this point (p=0.055, online supplemental figure S2A ).
Of note there was negative, but not yet significant correlation between CACNA1G and vimentin (r = - 0.488, P = 0.055), and between E-cadherin and vimentin (r = - 0.468, P = 0.058).
Between control and 1 nM MTX the difference was not yet significant (p = 0.056).
5 shows that although not yet significant ( P = 0.0586, paired t test) owing to the small sample size, 7 out of 9 comparisons (except for subfigures h and i) had stronger negative correlations than those shown in Fig. 4 , which was consistent with the conclusion of Fig. 2 that the CpG makers closer to the TSSs of the transcripts better regulated gene expression.
There was a greater proportion of female patients in the HMN and EMN groups than in the SN group, although the difference between the two groups was not yet significant ( p = 0.06).
In addition, compared with Matrix transplantation, MSCs+matrix transplantation only showed further marginally better effects but not yet significant differences in statistics for corneal wound healing ( P =0.06, Student's t -tests).
AAV-BDNF gene therapy yielded a trending, but not yet significant (p = 0.060), reduction in immobility of Magel2 -null mice during this test ( Figure 4 I).
At Day 3, improvement of QUALIN was not yet significant ( p = 0.065), but the change was significant from Day 7 onwards and continued to improve over time ( Table 8 ).
This difference was already emerging at M1, although not yet significant (96.3 ± 4.8% vs. 93.1 ± 8.0%; p = 0.067).
Whereas in 12.50% of the patients the OI lasted for 12-13 days and they had the highest, though not yet significant, PR of 16.22% (p=0.067).
This difference was not yet significant ( z = 1.36, p = 0.08).
reported in 2019 that the cumulative mean late lumen loss and ISR rate in the Eluvia arm were lower at 1st postoperative year (P <0.02), but the superiority on cumulative TLR rate was not yet significant (0% vs. 8%, P = 0.08) [ 67 ].
7 B), the correlation was stronger (Pearson’s correlation rho = 0.57); however, it was not yet significant ( p = 0.08).
3D , one-sample t test: t 17 = 2.48, P = 0.024, mean: 6.4%), this divergence was not yet significant at that moment for post-change trials ( Fig. 3D , post-change low Wilcoxon signed-rank test: n = 18, Z = 1.72, P = 0.085 and post-change high one-sample t test: t 17 = 1.43, P = 0.17).
Male piglets tended to be heavier than female piglets but this difference was not yet significant ( P = 0.0859).
Mean scores analysis showed a not yet significant main effect of assessment, F (1,56) = 2.85, p = 0.097, MSE = 4259.88, η p 2 = 0.049 , which was involved in a two-way interaction with BDNF, F (1,56) = 4.98, p = 0.045, MSE = 4259.88, η p 2 = 0.071.
However, at this age, semantics is not a significant predictor of the degree of either (a) unacceptability of ungrammatical un - forms or (b) acceptability of grammatical un - forms (though it may be possible to argue that this latter effect was moving in the predicted direction, although this was not yet significant, p = .10, n.s.).
Note that a significant difference with Bk was maintained over a long time, and in particular at time R2 [F(1,7) = 6.91, p < 0.05)], and that the difference with Bk was not yet significant when the temporal window was centered at 40 ms after perturbation onset (F(1,7) = 3.046, p > 0.10).