Barely Significant
← all phrases

possibly not significant

18 sentences · 18 papers · 867 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p ≈ 0.1p≈0.1

Reported by Matthew Hankins, whose collection is the reason this phrase is on the list.

In the literature

Clearly, Figure 7 requires such measurements; however, the significance of the result is somehow obscure: what do we expect for the relationship between drift velocity and gradient? Also, there seems to be a very small and possibly not significant (I do not find a statistical test) positive drift for the high range of the tested gradients: could these gradients be too shallow?
Interpretation of I 2 test was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ( 25 ), as follows: A) 0%–40%: indicates minimal or possibly not significant heterogeneity among the studies B) 30%–60%: could indicate moderate heterogeneity C) 50%–90%: may indicate significant heterogeneity D) 75%–100%: significant heterogeneity The significance of the observed I 2 value may be influenced by the quantity, direction, and strength of evidence for heterogeneity (e.g., P -value from the chi-square test or a confidence interval for I 2 ).
Whenever rhythmic 10-14 per second activity can be detected in the basal electroencephalogram, there are indications that this is the distant effect (volume conductor spread) of the simultaneous large potentials generated in the scalp regions or elsewhere. Occasionally one sees rhythmic 7 per second activity recorded with highest voltage from one or the other tympanic electrode. Penfield and Erickson have suggested that dreaming may be a function of the temporal lobes.' In the light of this it is an interesting, though possibly not significant, observation that there is superficially little to differentiate the waking electroencephalogram of the basal temporal regions from that obtained in early sleep.
, 29 , 30 ] Despite its multifactorial nature, a characteristic feature of AKI related to PO period is its association with systemic inflammation processes.[ 31 , 32 ] In the present study, urinary N-GAL showed a strong correlation to kidney dysfunction and a tendency toward increase in mortality (possibly not significant due to an insufficient number of patients).
Some questions and suggestions remain, How is it possible that Calsurf is marketed without any preclinical or clinical studies? For bovine or calf derived surfactant there is enough evidence and clinical studies, how does Calsurf relate to these products? Line 351-352 PEEP or no PEEP, If I look at figure 3, I see, possibly not significant, a positive effect of PEEP on the Cdyn.