Bangash et al 9 from the United Kingdom observed that LFT derangements were common in non-severe COVID-19 cases but possibly not significant.
← all phrases
“possibly not significant”
Sighted at
p ≈ 0.1p≈0.1
In the literature
Clearly, Figure 7 requires such measurements; however, the significance of the result is somehow obscure: what do we expect for the relationship between drift velocity and gradient? Also, there seems to be a very small and possibly not significant (I do not find a statistical test) positive drift for the high range of the tested gradients: could these gradients be too shallow?
Number of juveniles in the HH was not significant; however, this variable is moderately colinear with mean age of heads of HH and is possibly not significant for that reason.
I 2 was used to represent the heterogeneity of the results (0 to 40% for possibly not significant; 30 to 60% for may indicate moderate heterogeneity; 50 to 90% for may indicate significant heterogeneity; 75 to 100% for significant heterogeneity).
For sotrovimab-treated patients, we also report a reduced risk of hospitalisation or death during BA.1 predominance and non-significant trends for reduced risk during BA.2 and BA.5, possibly not significant due to low event rate and small sample size for this comparison.
Such ambiguity, although possibly not significant for the outcome, may create unnecessary confusion for the industry, and potentially lead to different application of the regulatory obligations that exist for substances with hazardous properties.
Interpretation of I 2 test was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ( 25 ), as follows: A) 0%–40%: indicates minimal or possibly not significant heterogeneity among the studies B) 30%–60%: could indicate moderate heterogeneity C) 50%–90%: may indicate significant heterogeneity D) 75%–100%: significant heterogeneity The significance of the observed I 2 value may be influenced by the quantity, direction, and strength of evidence for heterogeneity (e.g., P -value from the chi-square test or a confidence interval for I 2 ).
The effect of the T21I mutation on the protein-protein interactions at this interface may be difficult to predict and possibly not significant due to its peripheral location.
Whenever rhythmic 10-14 per second activity can be detected in the basal electroencephalogram, there are indications that this is the distant effect (volume conductor spread) of the simultaneous large potentials generated in the scalp regions or elsewhere. Occasionally one sees rhythmic 7 per second activity recorded with highest voltage from one or the other tympanic electrode. Penfield and Erickson have suggested that dreaming may be a function of the temporal lobes.' In the light of this it is an interesting, though possibly not significant, observation that there is superficially little to differentiate the waking electroencephalogram of the basal temporal regions from that obtained in early sleep.
A pharmacoeconomic assessment performed by Willan et al (2006) was possibly not significant because of the variability of drug costs and the short, six-month study period.
We suspect that if the mutation rates had been more equal, the difference in off-diagonal sums between D60 and O60 would have been even smaller and possibly not significant.
, 29 , 30 ] Despite its multifactorial nature, a characteristic feature of AKI related to PO period is its association with systemic inflammation processes.[ 31 , 32 ] In the present study, urinary N-GAL showed a strong correlation to kidney dysfunction and a tendency toward increase in mortality (possibly not significant due to an insufficient number of patients).
On the other hand, pioglitazone seems to be neutral or slightly (possibly not significant) associated with various cancers including bladder cancer [ 45 ], ovarian cancer [ 46 ], oral cancer [ 47 ], kidney cancer [ 48 ], and thyroid cancer [ 49 ].
The aim of this was to determine if, while possibly not significant, all of the expressed miRNA had increased after injury, or just those that were found to be significant.
This method allows for sensitive detection of differential use of exons, identifying events possibly not significant or detectable on a transcript level, and avoiding the uncertainties introduced by transcript assembly.
The swallowing of the nasal preparation was possibly not significant since the t max value was much higher (110.6 min) after the oral administration of dissolved MEL-containing viscous formulation [ 22 ].
The H18A/H19A mutant also exhibits a 7 cm −1 shift of the Y8a tyrosine band, while a smaller and possibly not significant change is observed in the K13E/R22G mutant.
Some questions and suggestions remain, How is it possible that Calsurf is marketed without any preclinical or clinical studies? For bovine or calf derived surfactant there is enough evidence and clinical studies, how does Calsurf relate to these products? Line 351-352 PEEP or no PEEP, If I look at figure 3, I see, possibly not significant, a positive effect of PEEP on the Cdyn.