almost significantp = 0.052
Intercanine width was slightly larger in the Seq 1 children (mean: 33.9 mm; SD: 2.85) than in Seq 2 (mean: 32.25 mm; SD: 2.82) ( p = 0.052, almost significant).
Intercanine width was slightly larger in the Seq 1 children (mean: 33.9 mm; SD: 2.85) than in Seq 2 (mean: 32.25 mm; SD: 2.82) ( p = 0.052, almost significant).
Maxillary variables showed a nearly statistically significant difference in intercanine width between Seq 1 (33.9 mm) and Seq 2 (32.25 mm).