“nearly statistically significant”

The difference in the general perception of food risk between countries was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.050).

According to Table 3 , the difference between the normal group and the OSA group was nearly statistically significant ( p < 0.05).

The use of prophylactic antibiotics was nearly statistically significant in the OS cohort (92% vs. 83.90%) ( p < 0.05).

These findings resulted in Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios of 2.72 and 4.36, respectively, with a nearly statistically significant difference ( p = 0.05; summarized in Table 3 and Table 5 A, and Figure 5 ).

The two Kaplan–Meier OS rates show a nearly statistically significant difference (p = 0.050; Fig. 3 ).

Post-hoc analysis did not identify a significant difference at any specific age, although 10 mos were nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.0510).

The impact of group alone on the alteration in wound contraction was nearly statistically significant, as indicated by a repeated measure ANOVA ( F (3,104) = 2.66, P = 0.052).

On preoperative echocardiography ( Tables 1 , E2 , and E3 , and Figure E1 , Figure E2 , Figure E3 ), there was a nearly statistically significant trend ( P = .052) toward greater prevalence of pulmonary valve pathology, defined as greater than mild insufficiency and/or leaflet thickening, in the PAB group.

study group 2: 102 (98.5–106) [mg/dL] ( p = 0.0091), which was associated with a nearly statistically significant difference in the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level: study group 1: 5.58 (5.18–5.7) vs. study group 2: 5.95 (5.61–6.06) [%] ( p = 0.053).

With a longer follow-up, the survival curves have converged, although the difference in the RMST at 12 yr is nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

And, although it was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.053), active heroin use was also related, although negatively, to persistence to MMP.

Meanwhile, the abundance of glycodeoxycholic acid and L-leucine were nearly statistically significant in its negatively correlated association with the level of glucose levels in umbilical cord blood without reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.054 and 0.058) (Table 3 ).

In this study, we evaluated susceptibility to BC for carriers of FA gene mutations and found that FANCD2 , FANCM and BRIP1 were nearly statistically significant (p = 0.055, 0.08 and 0.08, respectively).

74.3 ± 2.97 dB SPL, respectively; p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction) and a nearly statistically significant difference at 16 kHz (65.0 ± 2.24 dB SPL vs. 75.7 ± 0.71 dB SPL, respectively; p = 0.055, two-way ANOVA with Holm-Šidák correction; Figure 6 A).

However, after the first dose of plerixafor, the generic cohort patients had a higher median PBCD34+ count (59.0/μL) compared to brand cohort patients (43.5/μL), and this difference was nearly statistically significant ( p = .055).

The depths of ulcer infiltration and hypopyon were nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.056).

The MMP‐9 serum level showed a nearly statistically significant correlation ( r = .482; p = .057 by Spearman's test) with the albumin extravasation in the hippocampus.

This was the combination genotype of ADRB1 389 Gly carriers/ ADRA2C Del322‐325 carriers, which had a nearly statistically significant OR of <1.0 (0.72 [0.52, 1.01], P =0.057) (Table S8 ).

There was a nearly statistically significant interaction between ER level and TAM treatment duration ( p = 0.06).

For patients with grade 3 DCIS, there was a nearly statistically significant difference in OS ( P = .06) ( Fig. 2 B).

The survival might not reflect the role of Milan criteria, the prognosis for DFS was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.06).

Effect was especially strong in toddlers ( β = 0.45, p = 0.004), while in neonates, it remained nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.061).

17 ± 7 blinks/min.) although the difference was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.061, Mann–Whitney U ).

Race/ethnicity was nearly statistically significant ( p =0.062); the accrual of additional patients and/or longer follow-up may clarify.

For the CAL, significant reductions were observed in the test group at P+2 ( P = 0.0027) and P+3 ( P = 0.0019) as compared to the P-2 baseline, and in the placebo group at P0 ( P = 0.0049), P+2 ( P = 0.0017), and P+3 ( P ≤ 0.0001); at P0 in the test group, the reduction of CAL was nearly statistically significant ( P = 0.0640).