showed a trendp < 0.11
Patient cortical thickness did not differ from that of HCs in the RIFG ( p > 0.91, d = 0.036), while the LIFG showed a trend and a much larger effect size ( p < 0.11, d = 0.591).
Patient cortical thickness did not differ from that of HCs in the RIFG ( p > 0.91, d = 0.036), while the LIFG showed a trend and a much larger effect size ( p < 0.11, d = 0.591).