marginal significancep = 0.04
Marginal significance (i.e., without Bonferroni correction) was observed for the comparison of water to citrus in subject V1XS8 ( p = 0.04) and to coffee in subject O9ZEA ( p = 0.04).
Marginal significance (i.e., without Bonferroni correction) was observed for the comparison of water to citrus in subject V1XS8 ( p = 0.04) and to coffee in subject O9ZEA ( p = 0.04).
An additional analysis of the peak-to-peak amplitude between P200 and N200 components revealed significant difference between the “citrus” and “water” conditions: t = 2.679, p < 0.05, while the differences between “vanilla” and “water” were at the margin of statistical significance: t = 1.754, p = 0.086.
Additionally, pre-whitened Mann–Kendall test for all the correct responses from each subject per each trial ( Figure 9 ) revealed the absence of a significant trend ( z = −1.5609, p = 0.1186), as well as the test of the mean response time ( z = −0.3302, p = 0.7412, Figure 10 ).