Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

685 sentences · 685 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendP = 3.317e−060.0× alphagold
To assess this possibility, we compared delta divergence from the consensus between neighboring ERVs (|neighbor_1_div—neighbor_2_div|) in ERV hotspots to other regions of the genome and report a significant trend in the opposite direction (Mann Whitney U, P = 3.317e−06), suggesting that SD is not the primary contributing mechanism to ERV hotspot formation.
a significant trendP = 5.42 × 10 −50.0× alphagold
In Cox regression, patients with multihit abnormalities had a 2.89-fold increased risk of death compared with those with wild-type TP53 (95% CI, 1.88-4.43), and those with single-hit abnormalities had a 1.63-fold increased risk of death (95% CI, 0.91-2.91) compared with those with wild-type TP53 ( Figure 2 D), with a significant trend in the HR as the number of TP53 abnormalities increased (likelihood ratio test, P = 5.42 × 10 −5 ).
a significant trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Comparison of the staining patterns among patients revealed a significant trend towards increased frequency of DFS pattern (ANA associated diseases 10.4%, JIA 21.7% and nonrheumatic conditions 34.8%, p < 0.0001) and decreased frequency of homogenous staining (ANA associated diseases 34.3%, JIA 26.7% and nonrheumatic conditions 8.9%, p < 0.0001) in nonrheumatic conditions.
a significant trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Further, the number of sickle-shaped blood vessels was associated with distant metastasis and OS, with a significant trend toward a poor prognosis (metastasis P < 0.001, Cox; OS P < 0.001, Cox) observed for patients with more than 100 such vessels in large maximal tumor sections.
a significant trendP<0.0010.0× alphagold
Consistently, when RDW was assessed as quartiles, compared with the reference group (quartile 1, RDW ≤12.4%), the HRs of recurrence of ischemic stroke was 1.372 (95% CI=0.671–2.805, P=0.386) in quartile 2 (12.8%≥RDW>12.4%), 1.835 (95% CI=1.222–2.755, P=0.003) in quartile 3 (13.3%≥RDW>12.8%), and 1.732 (95% CI=1.114–2.561, P<0.001) in quartile 4 (RDW>13.3%), with a significant trend test (P<0.001) after adjusting for covariables.