Interestingly, when calculated with nomogram, the PAD of central CST reduction showed a trend of under-correction in the mild subgroup (1.20 ± 3.14 μm, Table 3 ) and overcorrection in the high subgroup (− 5.39 ± 9.88 μm, Table 3 ), although it was not statistically significant.
← all excerpts
Comparison of planned versus achieved central corneal stromal thickness reduction in SMILE versus FS-LASIK: a retrospective study.
1
—
—