showed a trendp < 0.07
In contrast, dietary DDGS showed a trend to increase ( p < 0.07) HC (25.53 vs. 24.6 kg; Figure 5 ), CC (21.1 vs. 19.8 kg), and ( p < 0.08) MC a (16.59 vs. 16.3) relative to the control across comparisons.
In contrast, dietary DDGS showed a trend to increase ( p < 0.07) HC (25.53 vs. 24.6 kg; Figure 5 ), CC (21.1 vs. 19.8 kg), and ( p < 0.08) MC a (16.59 vs. 16.3) relative to the control across comparisons.