Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparison of weight captured via electronic health record and cellular scales to the gold-standard clinical method.

Obes Sci Pract · 2023 · PMC10399518 · PMID 37546286

1
hedged sentence
0.5000
closest p · 10.0× alpha
0.5000
boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.5not close (p > 0.1)
Finally, models accounting for time from randomization and the difference between the EHR and in‐person weight did not reach statistical significance (−0.3 kg; SE: 0.4; p = 0.5), indicating that at baseline no statistical differences between whether the EHR visit was before or after the baseline visit. 5.2 Electronic health record and in‐person weight estimation of intervention effects comparison Analyses using the study scale used weights from all n = 222 participants while analyses utilizing the EHR weights included only n = 211 participants due to 11 individuals not having a clinical encounter during the study period.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.