marginally significantp = 0.056
Marginally significant was the interaction Stimulus Type × Self Relevance × Electrode, F 8,192 = 2.42, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.09, because in some conditions power tended to be largest at AFz.
Marginally significant was the interaction Stimulus Type × Self Relevance × Electrode, F 8,192 = 2.42, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.09, because in some conditions power tended to be largest at AFz.
In conclusion, the theta ISPC results showed a trend consistent with the theta power results.