a trend toward significanceP = 0.07
The slope of the salivary flow rate did not differ significantly between conditions, but analyses showed a trend toward significance ( F [1.00, 36.00] = 3.39, P = 0.07).
The slope of the salivary flow rate did not differ significantly between conditions, but analyses showed a trend toward significance ( F [1.00, 36.00] = 3.39, P = 0.07).
This difference, however, failed to reach statistical significance when controlled for age and gender ( F [1.00, 36.00] = 1.46, P = 0.24), as well as when corrected for multiple comparisons (then P = 0.175).
sAA levels at the last measurement point were slightly higher during tVNS ( t (19) = 2.26, P = 0.035, d = 0.51), but this effect failed to reach significance when controlled for multiple comparisons.