5.54 (1.24), but were equally willing to work with both in a future experiment, t(25) = 1.67, p = .11 (although the near-significant trend was in the predicted direction, M(SD) = 6.27 (0.78) vs. 5.92 (1.09)).
1
—
—
5.54 (1.24), but were equally willing to work with both in a future experiment, t(25) = 1.67, p = .11 (although the near-significant trend was in the predicted direction, M(SD) = 6.27 (0.78) vs. 5.92 (1.09)).