Predictors of how often and when people fall in love.

Evol Psychol · 2010 · PMC10481035 · PMID 22947775

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep =.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The prediction was marginally supported, as the interaction term was positive and approached significance for men ( p =.06).

also in 1,040 other papers

a notable trendp = .10so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

However, when sex drive is added as an additional covariate, the sex difference is no longer significant, although there is still a notable trend in the predicted direction ( F (4, 346) = 2.70, p = .10).

also in 902 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported

As can be seen in Table 2 , the two control variables (age and other-sex contact) were significant or marginally significant for both sexes, highlighting the importance of including them in the analyses.

also in 3,965 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.