only marginally significantp = 0.047
As seen in Table 2 , which presents the obtained model, the Gender × Prime type interaction was in the expected direction but only marginally significant. 4 Importantly, women’s math performance was higher in the attachment security condition than in the neutral condition, F (1,144) = 4.02, p = 0.047, η 2 p = 0.03, 90% CI [0.001, 0.084]. 5 In particular, M difference = 1.49, 95% CI [0.022, 2.967].