“only marginally significant”

Some studies showed significant differences ( P = 0.09,[ 66 ] P = 0.063,[ 146 ] P = 0.054,[ 31 ] which were only marginally significant, P = 0.000,[ 71 ] P = 0.000,[ 144 ] P = 0.003,[ 65 ] P = 0.000,[ 4 ] P = 0.000[ 70 ]) and some did not demonstrate significant or marginally significant differences ( P > 0.1).[ 66 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 176 ] TREATMENT OF CONGENITALLY MISSING TEETH CMT has direct clinical implications.

Niche expansion was found to be higher in species with high dispersal distance, with high mean SLA and seed mass (only marginally significant), and high seed mass variability, in annual species, and those introduced from temperate and tropical biomes ( φ = 5.5; p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.51, d.f. = 10; Figure 2a,c for specific examples).

In contrast, the study connection was only marginally significant (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94–1.00; p = 0003) and did not link with the progression of proliferative alterations in males with prostate cancer (n = 22,773) compared to the control group (n = 23,050) [ 141 ].

We also performed a logistic regression on the first squeeze of each sequence for each individual monkey, and both effects were also significant at the subject level except for the reward size effect on monkey D which was only marginally significant (monkey A: β (sequence length) = − 0.82 ± 0.05, t (2740) = −15.83, p < 0.001, β (reward size) = 0.89 ± 0.05, t (2740) = 13.09, p < 0.001; monkey D: β (sequence length) = − 0.12 ± 0.05, t (1553) = − 2.41, p = 0.02, β (reward size) = − 0.09 ± 0.05, t (1553) = − 1.83, p = 0.07; monkey E: β (sequence length) = − 1.21 ± 0.10, t (1491) = − 11.78, p < 0.001, β (reward size) = 0.83 ± 0.07, t (1491) = 12.66, p < 0.001).

The “high” group showed a significant improvement in their d-prime scores [ F (1, 14) = 19.44, p ≤.001], whereas the “low” group displayed only marginally significant improvement [ F (1, 14) = 19.44, p ≤.001].

2, this difference was only marginally significant [t(14) = 4.3, p < 0.001 and t(11) = 2.0, p = 0.075].

Whereas the low autonomy slope was significantly positive, t (439) = 7.39, p < .001, the high autonomy slope was only marginally significant, t (439) = 1.74, p = .08.

Nonreacting (FFMQ) The full-null model comparison was only marginally significant after correction for multiple testing ( χ 2 = 116.82, df = 13, p < 0.001, p cor < 0.001, R 2 marg = 0.050, R 2 cond = 0.622; see Fig. 3 for scores and Fig. 6 for a visual summary).

The tibia length of adults from both aphid species were smaller on the infected plants than on the non-infected plants ( Table S1 ), although the effect was only marginally significant for R. padi ( M. dirhodum : F 1,72 = 43.22, p <0.001; R. padi : F 1,83 = 3.61, p = 0.061).

For HP, a significant reduction was observed at 12 months but was only marginally significant at 24 months, probably due to the large between-patient variation (IQR = 13% at 24 months versus 6.7% at 12 months) (median decrease of BMD by -2.4%, P < 0.001 and -5.7%, P = 0.09, respectively); however, only 11 patients (22%) became osteopenic and 2 (4%) became osteoporotic.

However, due to the lack of sufficient power in the subsample, the effects on intentions to vaccination against COVID-19 were only marginally significant (effect on social norms F (1, 37) = 62.04, p < 0.001; effects on intentions F (1, 37) = 3.56, p = 0.067).

Conversely, in LAVA, the correlations between these traits were only marginally significant and did not survive correction for pairwise testing ( p = 1.43 × 10 −3 , see Figure 3 and Supplementary Table S31 ).

The interaction term was only marginally significant, and post-hoc t-tests revealed a decrease in response time with practice in the SI group (p = 0.002), but not in the II group (p = 0.358).

Interestingly, when we tested these two models in a combined panel that included both males and females, the additive model remained insignificant, and the dominant model also became only marginally significant (nominal p = 0.003 in the LMG data; nominal p = 0.0159 in the DG data).

Overall, this finding suggests that more information about Notochthamalus will be recovered from further exploration in locations to the south of Niebla; additional genotyping also will be necessary to increase the power of this test, as the five loci indicated have only marginally significant results for the CND test; correction for multiple testing would, in fact, require a P -value of <0.003, which none of these loci obtain.

As a result, we found all the differences highly significant ( P < 10 −10 ), except the difference between TribeMCL and gUPGMA, which was only marginally significant ( P = 0.004) (see Supplementary Figure S2).

The difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.007).

Both groups exhibited implicit adaptive salience (see Table 1 ), though this effect was only marginally significant in the TRS group [controls: mean = 8.85 ms, SD = 17.34 ms, t(30) = 2.841, P = 0.008; patients: mean = 12.28 ms, SD = 24.87 ms, t(17) = 2.093, P = 0.052].

The only marginally significant temporal trend observed was a decrease ( p = 0.008) in POM-C concentrations that occurred between spring and fall during the maize phase of the 3YR rotation, where POM-C fell from a spring high of 2.79 g cm -3 to a fall value of 1.48 g cm -3 ( Fig 1A ).

Using the top-ranked genes, we largely recapitulated the ER+ and basal-like subtypes (Additional file 6 : Figure S2c) although the association between patients’ survival and our subtypes is only marginally significant after multiple testing adjustment ( P = 0.008, Additional file 7 : Figure S3c).

t -tests demonstrated that these correlations were significant in all scene-selective ROIs except for the LH RSC, where the correlation was only marginally significant (LH PPA: r ̄ = .17, t (14) = 3.05, p < .009; RH PPA: r ̄ = .15, t (14) = 3.06, p < .008; LH RSC: r ̄ = .08, t (14) = 1.88, p < .08; RH RSC: r ̄ = .15, t (14) = 4.29, p < .001; LH OPA: r ̄ = .23, t (14) = 7.38, p < .000003; RH OPA: r ̄ = .16, t (14) = 2.24, p < .04).

Finally, while the interaction between agent judgment and dilemma type was only marginally significant, we looked at simple effects regardless and found that across both consequentialist and non-consequentialist participants, people were more likely to cooperate with the non-consequentialist (73%) than the consequentialist agent (57%) in the sacrificial dilemma, x 2 (1) = 6.73, p = .009.

Interestingly there were three SNPs in GSN (rs10985196, rs7046030 and rs12683459), all highly correlated with pairwise r 2 values >0.90, which were highly significant (trend P<10 −6 ) in Sample Set 2 but only marginally significant in Sample Set 1 (trend P = 0.01–0.05).

Collapsing over SOAs, the overall effect of 13 ms was only marginally significant, F 1 (1, 90)=12.43, p <01; F 2 (1, 21)=3.59, p =.07.

In the multivariate model, living in severe poverty was only marginally significant ( p < 0.01) associated with having increased odds of having experienced a most unsafe abortion.