showed a 70% success rate for DAIR compared to 75% in the two-stage group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance [ 29 ]; Barry et al. showed DAIR to be as effective as two-stage exchange for preventing reoperation for infection and more effective for maintaining function [ 30 ]; Leta’s team compared DAIR, one-stage, and two-stage revisions and found a 19% (63/329), 13.9% (10/72), and 11.5% (28/243) re-revision rate for infection, respectively [ 12 ].
← all excerpts
The Economics of Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
1
—
—