marginally significantp = 0.051
The control group performed slightly better than the department group (0.784 ± 0.019 vs 0.731 ± 0.018); the main effect of the participant group was marginally significant, F (1,45) = 4.036, p = 0.051, ηp 2 = 0.082.
The control group performed slightly better than the department group (0.784 ± 0.019 vs 0.731 ± 0.018); the main effect of the participant group was marginally significant, F (1,45) = 4.036, p = 0.051, ηp 2 = 0.082.
Although the department group showed numerically higher categorization accuracy for the colleague faces than for the unfamiliar faces, it did not reach statistical significance.