Barely Significant
← all excerpts

On the role of top-down and bottom-up guidance in conjunction search: Singleton interference revisited.

Atten Percept Psychophys · 2023 · PMC10545595 · PMID 37017865

2
hedged sentences
0.2980
closest p · 6.0× alpha
0.2980
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.298not close (p > 0.1)
No other main effect or interaction approached significance: nonsingleton features of the singleton target, F (1, 15) = 1.16, η p 2 = 0.07, p = 0.298; display size, F (1, 15) = 0.00, η p 2 = 0.00, p = 0.991; Target Presence × Nonsingleton Features of the Singleton Target, F (1,15) = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.00, p = 0.944; Target Presence × Display Size, F (1, 15) = 1.56, η p 2 = 0.09, p = 0.230; Nonsingleton Features of the Singleton Target × Display Size, F (1, 15) = 0.52, η p 2 = 0.03, p = 0.481; Target Presence × Nonsingleton Features of the Singleton Target × Display Size, F (1,15) = 0.77, η p 2 = 0.05, p = 0.409.

also in 8,237 other papers

may be significantno p-value reported
Firstly, whilst the interference in conjunction search may be significant, it may be smaller than the interference observed in feature search (when closely matched displays are used).

also in 13,097 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.