Temperament & Character account for brain functional connectivity at rest: A diathesis-stress model of functional dysregulation in psychosis.

The power of the TCI to predict the membership of individuals in a particular rsFC group (i.e., squared multiple regression R 2 ) was strong and highly significant for group 1 (R 2 = 52%, F = 79.42, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.11), group 3 (R 2 = 67%, F = 142.9, p < 1E−5, RMSE = 0.07), group 4 (R 2 = 35%, f = 51.2, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.17), and group 5 (R 2 = 46%, F = 7 l.9, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.14).

also in 23,678 other papers

For example, there were weakly significant differences (0.01 < p < 0.05) by diagnosis in network connectivity correlations in group 1 (4 of 279), group 2 (12 of 1077), group 3 (3 of 366), group 4 (0 of 627) and group 5 (1 of 209).

also in 271 other papers