“weakly significant”

There was a weakly significant negative correlation between desire and all items of the MRS (psychological [ r = −0.26, P = .000], somatic [ r = −0.21, P = .000], and urogenital [ r = −0.19, P = .001]), between arousal and all items of the MRS (psychological [ r = −0.26, P = .000], somatic [ r = −0.30, P = .000], and urogenital

The results summarized in Table 7 indicate that there is a weakly significant inverse relationship between the min pressure and vegetation height r (61) = − 0.39, n = 62, p << 0.00*.

Mean annual precipitation shows a very weakly significant primary linear correlation with erosion rate (R 2 = 0.017 and p-value = 0.000001; Fig 3 ).

In previously-infected individuals, moderate and weakly significant correlations were reported between Wuhan S-specific ACE2 inhibition and IgG (r=0.5642, p<0.0001) ( Supplementary Figure 9B ), as well as IgA responses (r=0.4545, p=0.0001) ( Supplementary Figure 9C ), respectively.

In the remaining three tissues, we found weak evidence of colocalization between the GWAS and ATP11A- eQTL signals (PP4 < 0.408; Table S9 ), likely because of weakly significant eQTL p values in the locus ( p values >10 −4 ).

We considered four thresholds of decreasing stringency: a highly significant set (HS - p ≤ 5 × 10 -7 ), a Medium highly significant set (MHS - p ≤ 10 -5 ), a Medium weakly significant set (MWS - p ≤ 10 -4 ), and a weakly significant set (WS - p ≤ 10 -3 ).

A highly significant increase of both anti-al34k2 IgG1 and IgG4 levels was observed in PD2 by pairwise comparisons between paired samples ( n = 68, p < 0.0001; Figure 4B ); instead, only IgG4 levels showed a weakly significant increase after summer when all samples were considered ( p = 0.0326, Figure 4A ).

However, some weakly significant correlations were seen between the T cell response and the IgG2 response, with one highly significant correlation at week 8 (r 2 = 0.14, p < 0.0001).

For instance, for OXY1, the enrichment was 35% versus 19% and the medians 0.38 versus 0.27, while for TUBE early, the enrichment was comparatively weakly significant, 27 versus 24% ( P = 0.0004), and the medians, 0.53 versus 0.44.

In all figures, we marked the permutation test results as follows: If the number of failures was, for example, 1 in 10,000 ( p = 0.0001) or less, it was marked as highly significant (***), 5 in 10,000 ( p = 0.0005) or less, as significant (**), and 10 in 10,000 ( p = 0.001) or less, as weakly significant (*).

As a result of the analysis, a weakly significant correlation was detected between the two values (r=0.185, p<0.001).

In each case, the relationship was highly significant for crown age ( r = 0.43–0.47, P < 0.001) but nonsignificant or weakly significant ( r = 0.02–0.09, P = 0.01–0.82) using stem age (see Materials and Methods).

While, the fungal communities in the rhizosphere soil of the green manure crops showed weakly significant differences from those in the fallow treatments (ANOSIM: R = 0.208, p = 0.001), so was located among the three fertilizer types (ANOSIM: R = 0.120, p = 0.009; Figure 3B ). 3.1.4.

Results were interpreted as highly significant*** (p<0.001), significant** (p<0.01), weakly significant* (p<0.05) or not significant ns (p>0.05).

p -values were considered weakly significant if p < 0.05 (*), significant if p < 0.01 (**), and highly significant if p < 0.001 (***).

This revealed 3 genes that were highly significant differentially expressed (p > 0.001), 2 genes significant differentially expressed (p > 0.01) and 5 genes weakly significant differentially expressed (p > 0.05) ( Table 2 ) after multiple testing correction.

We specifically addressed these two issues in our reanalysis of this noisy data by - (a) Considering a series of four thresholds of decreasing stringency, starting with the highly significant threshold used in the original study, and decreasing to weakly significant(WS - p ≤ 10 -3 ).

As a result of the analysis, it was found that there was a weakly significant negative relationship between these two variables ( r = –0.29, p < 0.001).

However, only weakly significant relationships were observed between general practitioners’ age their years of practice, and their attitudes toward autism (r = 0.271**, p < 0.001; r = 0.105*, p = 0.046, respectively).

The study also identified weakly significant correlations between GPs' age and their attitudes toward autism ( r = 0.271⁣ ∗∗ , p < 0.001) and between years of practice and attitudes ( r = 0.105⁣ ∗ , p =0.046).

In a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression hazard model, s-apelin was a weakly significant predictor of decompensation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.002; p<0.001) and mortality (HR, 1.003; p<0.001).

Results were interpreted as highly significant*** (p < 0.001), significant** (p < 0.01), weakly significant* (p < 0.05) or not significant ns (p > 0.05).

Spearman correlation test showed a weakly significant relationship between body satisfaction and attempt to lose weight during the past two years (r = –0.22, P = 0.001) and a significant relationship between body satisfaction and the desire to lose weight (r = 0.45, P = 0.001) and Appearance Evaluation (r = –0.57, P = 0.001).

PAPP-A value and free hCG have a positive and statistically weakly significant connection (r=0.246, p=0.001), as do PAPP-A value and Apgar 5 th minute score (r=0.159, p=0.001).

Predictors that were selected consistently [at least weakly significant ( p < 0.05) in two out of three selection processes and at least highly significant ( p < 0.001) in one] were used for consecutive analyses.