There was a statistically significant difference between the world countries, given that a higher number of low‐middle (73.08%) and low‐income countries (72.4%) exhibited a negative trend in the annual CO 2 growth, compared to upper‐middle (53.7%) and high‐income (46.27%) countries.
← all excerpts
A Preliminary Assessment of Global CO<sub>2</sub>: Spatial Patterns, Temporal Trends, and Policy Implications.
2
—
—
The sentences
For the share of global CO 2 emissions, we identified two contradictory patterns, with a remarkable decline in high‐income countries like the US and the UK, while a positive trend was seen for low‐middle (e.g., India) and upper‐middle (e.g., China and Brazil) countries.