Retrospective Review of Double vs Triple Hindfoot Arthrodesis: Clinical and Radiographic Comparison

Foot Ankle Orthop · 2023 · PMC10748640

Europe PMC

hedged sentence

0.0890

closest p · 1.8× alpha

0.0890

boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.089so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Operative time was shorter for doubles compared to triples, but this did not reach statistical significance (104 min vs 117 min, p = 0.089).

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.