dual-tasking failed to reach significance, F (1, 36) = 1.85; p = 0.183; η G 2 = 0.001, there was a significant three-way interaction of rowing intensity, single- vs. dual-tasking, and group, F (3, 36) = 3.58; p = 0.023; η G 2 = 0.003.
A Bonferroni-corrected post hoc analysis revealed no significant differences in the means of the score in MoL between the three expert groups (beginners and experts: p = 0.055; experts and intermediate: p = 1.000; 2 and 1: p = 0.097), but the difference between beginners and experts showed a trend in favor of the experts.