a significant trendp = 0.02
However, there was a significant trend effect of examiner ( F [3,34.63] = 3.6, p = 0.02) with lower respiratory frequencies in participants treated by examiner 3 compared to examiner 1 and 2 ( p < 0.05; examiner 1: 0.21 ± 0.07; examiner 2: 0.22 ± 0.07; examiner 3: 0.12 ± 0.03; examiner 4: 0.25 ± 0.04). 4.