marginally significantp = 0.06
This new set of analyses identified marginally significant differences ( t = 2.30, df = 5.76, two-sided p = 0.06) for PTSD between cannabis use and tobacco use, with the former having higher ORs.
This new set of analyses identified marginally significant differences ( t = 2.30, df = 5.76, two-sided p = 0.06) for PTSD between cannabis use and tobacco use, with the former having higher ORs.
Associations with anxiety for their part tended to be weaker than associations with other mental disorders, reaching statistical significance for cross-sectional studies in t -test comparisons with personality disorder ( t = 2.61, df = 33, two-sided p = 0.014) and marginal significance ( t = 1.86, df = 97, two-sided p = 0.066) with depression.
In studies of cannabis and tobacco use, adjustment for its counterpart was a highly significant negative influence on odds ratios.
Sensitivity analyses that removed the studies with bivariate figures from the dataset introduced differences, albeit of marginal significance, relating to the association between cannabis use and PTSD.