a negative trendp = 0.08
Neither manifestation alone was statistically significant; although, there was a negative trend for PDV identification in subjects with tics ( p = 0.08).
Neither manifestation alone was statistically significant; although, there was a negative trend for PDV identification in subjects with tics ( p = 0.08).
Cases with and without a PDV are not significantly more or less likely to have an affected first-degree relative with a substantial NDD; although, there is a possible trend (+PDV 13/34 (38%) with a first-degree relative affected, no PDV 3/16 (19%), p = 0.18, odds ratio 2.7, 95% CI 0.6–11).