a numerical trendp = 0.06
While there was a numerical trend towards improved PFS in the GemOx + cetuximab KRAS-wild type arm, this was not significant (mPFS 7.1 months [GemOx + cetuximab] vs 5.6 months [GemOx]; p = 0.06) [ 118 ].
While there was a numerical trend towards improved PFS in the GemOx + cetuximab KRAS-wild type arm, this was not significant (mPFS 7.1 months [GemOx + cetuximab] vs 5.6 months [GemOx]; p = 0.06) [ 118 ].
Another review including 45 patients with eCCA ( n = 33 [adjuvant RT]; n = 12 [neoadjuvant CT]) found that 11 (91%) patients treated neoadjuvantly had R0 resections and numerically improved 5-year OS, trending towards significance (53% vs 23%; p = 0.16) compared to those who received adjuvant treatment [ 69 ].