Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Sequential versus Standard Triple Therapy for First-Line <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Eradication: An Update.

Antibiotics (Basel) · 2024 · PMC10885881 · PMID 38391522

3
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

Although there seemed to be a similar proportion in the nitroimidazole-resistance cure rates (83% versus 82%) as well as in the dual resistance group (62% versus 54%), these apparent advantages of SEQ did not reach statistical significance when compared to STT.

also in 111,027 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
For the length of the STT regimen, the previously reported benefit of SEQ when compared to 10-day STT ( Figure 9 ) could not be demonstrated in the most recent studies (2010 onwards), in which the efficacy of SEQ showed a marginally significant statistical advantage, but it was potentially equivalent to that of 10-day STT at a clinical level. 2.6.3.

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported
When including only studies where SEQ and STT were both given for 10 days, the alleged benefit offered by SEQ was reduced to marginal significance in the studies using standard acid inhibition.

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.