Despite showing a trend in this direction, the difference between ∆P TM -based and PCWP-based diastolic stiffness constant β did not reach statistical significance (AUC difference, −0.081; 95% CI, −0.167 to 0.004; P = .003).
1
0.0030
0.0030
Despite showing a trend in this direction, the difference between ∆P TM -based and PCWP-based diastolic stiffness constant β did not reach statistical significance (AUC difference, −0.081; 95% CI, −0.167 to 0.004; P = .003).