a clear trendP = 0.056
6e ); however, there were no significant differences in rate changes between genotypes, despite a clear trend for a slower rate in OsEPF1oeS (Kruskal–Wallis one‐way ANOVA, overall P = 0.056) (Fig. 6f ).
6e ); however, there were no significant differences in rate changes between genotypes, despite a clear trend for a slower rate in OsEPF1oeS (Kruskal–Wallis one‐way ANOVA, overall P = 0.056) (Fig. 6f ).