showed a trendp <0.00001
Use of rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD −3.95 mmol/mol [−0.36%]; 95% CI −5.46 to −2.44, p <0.00001, I 2 =0%) than use of isCGM (MD −1.79 mmol/mol [−0.16%]; 95% CI −5.28, 1.69, p =0.31, I 2 =64%).
Use of rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD −3.95 mmol/mol [−0.36%]; 95% CI −5.46 to −2.44, p <0.00001, I 2 =0%) than use of isCGM (MD −1.79 mmol/mol [−0.16%]; 95% CI −5.28, 1.69, p =0.31, I 2 =64%).