Barely Significant
← all excerpts

The type 1 submovement conundrum: an investigation into the function of velocity zero-crossings within two-component aiming movements.

Exp Brain Res · 2024 · PMC10973010 · PMID 38329516

2
hedged sentences
0.0530
closest p · 1.1× alpha
0.0530
boldest claim

The sentences

approached conventional levels of significancep = 0.053so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Further inspection of the time including the time to the primary submovement showed a main effect of type that approached conventional levels of significance, F (2,14) = 3.65, p = 0.053, ƞ p 2 = 0.34, where there appeared to be shorter times for movements with a functional and non-functional type 1 compared to type 2 + 3.

also in 19 other papers

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported
However, the time of the primary submovement showed a significant main effect of type, F (2,20) = 4.37, p = 0.049, ƞ p 2 = 0.30, with a shorter time for movements with a functional ( p = 0.075) and non-functional ( p = 0.037) type 1 compared to type 2 + 3, although these pairwise comparisons failed to reach significance.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.