Further inspection of the time including the time to the primary submovement showed a main effect of type that approached conventional levels of significance, F (2,14) = 3.65, p = 0.053, ƞ p 2 = 0.34, where there appeared to be shorter times for movements with a functional and non-functional type 1 compared to type 2 + 3.
← all excerpts
The type 1 submovement conundrum: an investigation into the function of velocity zero-crossings within two-component aiming movements.
2
0.0530
0.0530
The sentences
However, the time of the primary submovement showed a significant main effect of type, F (2,20) = 4.37, p = 0.049, ƞ p 2 = 0.30, with a shorter time for movements with a functional ( p = 0.075) and non-functional ( p = 0.037) type 1 compared to type 2 + 3, although these pairwise comparisons failed to reach significance.