Although both components showed a trend for lower means in infected males (Estimated Marginal Means (EMM) ± SE, proportion of mated females: infected 59.5 ± 1.8%, sham‐treated 63.3 ± 1.8%; number of offspring per mated female, infected 37.4 ± 0.681, sham‐treated 39.1 ± 0.696), neither difference was statistically significant (Table S6 ).
← all excerpts
Effects of an entomopathogenic fungus on the reproductive potential of <i>Drosophila</i> males.
1
—
—