Authors’ Response to Peer Reviews of “Cross-Modal Sensory Boosting to Improve High-Frequency Hearing Loss: Device Development and Validation”

Perhaps something like “Participants without hearing aids demonstrated a trend toward higher self-reported benefit, though this did not reach statistical significance.” I know the authors reference the Cox 10-point criterion, but I am not sure that can be accurately applied to these data when the statistical test says the group means themselves are not statistically different (maybe related to the small sample size and variance in the data).

also in 111,027 other papers