Although there was a trend for higher unadjusted HR values compared to the adjusted HRs, the difference did not reach statistical significance (unadjusted HR : 5.07 [95% CI 2.77 - 9.26], adjusted HR 2.86 [95% CI 1.70 - 4.83] p =0.055) (Fig. 3 B).
← all excerpts
Risk of conversion to mild cognitive impairment or dementia among subjects with amyloid and tau pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
1
0.0550
0.0550