Susceptibility to stress and nature exposure: Unveiling differential susceptibility to physical environments; a randomized controlled trial.

The direction of the simple slopes for each condition suggests a pro-inflammatory phenotype had a positive trend on stress recovery in the nature condition (SNS: β = -0.335, 95% CI [-0.586, -0.083], p = .010; RMSSD: β = 0.134, 95% CI [-0.117, 0.385], p = .290; PNS: β = 0.186, 95% CI [-0.043, 0.414], p = 0.110) but a negative trend on stress recovery in the office condition (SNS: β = 0.055, 95% CI [-0.202, 0.311], p = .671; RMSSD: β = -0.248, 95% CI [-0.502, 0.007], p = .056; PNS: β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.381, 0.084], p = .206), although these trends were modest and mostly non-significant.

also in 2,043 other papers

The direction of the simple slopes for each condition suggests a pro-inflammatory phenotype had a positive trend on stress recovery in the nature condition (SNS: β = -0.335, 95% CI [-0.586, -0.083], p = .010; RMSSD: β = 0.134, 95% CI [-0.117, 0.385], p = .290; PNS: β = 0.186, 95% CI [-0.043, 0.414], p = 0.110) but a negative trend on stress recovery in the office condition (SNS: β = 0.055, 95% CI [-0.202, 0.311], p = .671; RMSSD: β = -0.248, 95% CI [-0.502, 0.007], p = .056; PNS: β = -0.148, 95% CI [-0.381, 0.084], p = .206), although these trends were modest and mostly non-significant.

also in 790 other papers