highly significantP < 0.001
beta: 0.01 (95% CI: -0.15; 0.18); P = 0.88), whereas the indirect path was highly significant (std. beta: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.08; 0.31); P < 0.001).
beta: 0.01 (95% CI: -0.15; 0.18); P = 0.88), whereas the indirect path was highly significant (std. beta: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.08; 0.31); P < 0.001).
In controls, many of these associations had a similar direction, but did not reach statistical significance.