Despite that similar trends were observed in stage II and IV patients, the results did not reach statistical significance (stage II: 71.4% vs. 29.4%, HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.22–10.60, p =0.069; stage IV: 16.7% vs. 14.8%, HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 0.94–3.69, p =0.083, Supplementary Figures 5B, D ).
← all excerpts
Novel pretreatment nomograms based on pan-immune-inflammation value for predicting clinical outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
1
0.0690
0.0690